Showing posts with label divorce. Show all posts
Showing posts with label divorce. Show all posts

Where's George?

From Eurweb

We hope Shellie Zimmerman has a plan b as far as serving George Zimmerman with divorce papers.

Yes, what we’re trying to say is that the divorce proceedings are on hold because the Zman’s gone ghost.

The divorce can’t move forward until George is served with papers, but Shellie’s lawyer tells TMZ, George has gone underground.

 The lawyer says he can’t find George anywhere and has no idea how to track him down.
Sources close to George’s family tell us they’re in contact with him — and he’s safe — but they don’t know exactly where he is. We’re told George plans to lay low for the foreseeable future.

As we reported, George Zimmerman caused a media firestorm last week after allegedly punching his estranged wife’s father in the face. He’s been in hiding ever since.

What a guy!

My thoughts on Track and Britta calling it quits (and there are a lot of them)



As all of you are aware Track and Britta Palin are divorcing.  Can't say that I'm surprised.  Nothing good has ever come out of being married to or breeding with a Heath/Palin.  Ask Levi Johnston and Mike Wooten.  The only one I feel sorry for is Kyla.

Must be a Palin/Heath record for the shortest marriage.  No I take that back...Bristol and Gino's trial marriage was shorter.  The only other political kid's marriage that was that short of is Elliott Roosevelt (son of FDR) and Elizabeth Donner's (January 16, 1932-July 17, 1933).  Back in Elliott's day you had to go to Reno to get a divorce.

 I think the marriage was a sham.  Sarah promised they would have a big reception but it never happened. And Britta's comments to Radar Online speaks volumes.  She said she is OK with it.  I doubt she and Track planned to stay married anyway.  Also someone on IM made this comment:

track has never been right in the head. He has this "nervous tick" where he constantly make a noise and facial expressions, and its just got worse and worse over time. he is a nightmare to be married to. 

If that is really true then I hope Track has supervised visitation.  I don't know if he is completely over his drug addictions either.

Sarah and Todd, leave Britta alone!  You too Bristol and Willow  You harassed Mike Wooten enough.  Don't repeat it with Britta.  And please don't disparage Britta in front of Kyla like you did to Levi .  Remember the judge that warned you to stop doing that in front of Mike's kids.

When I first saw this picture I wondered if Track and Britta were on the outs:



I think this picture was originally posted on Bristol's FB page, not sure.  But then after it was all over the internet, Chuckles Jr posted this one:


Ta-da!  There's Britta!  Any proof this was photoshopped?

I bet Sarah tipped off  TMZ about this so people would ignore Dairygate.  Course that isn't the first time she has thrown her kids under the bus.

It looks like Track got the better end of the deal in the divorce

.Track Palin and his soon-to-be ex-wife Britta filed divorce docs which tick off who gets what.
-- 23-year-old Track -- an Army reservist -- gets the $30,000 Wells Fargo bank account, $500 in tools, and his $1,000 gun collection.

-- 22-year-old Britta gets her $2,500 bank account and her $4,000 in jewelry.

According to the doc, Track rakes in $42,800 a year -- and has agreed to pay $642 a month in child support. Track and Britta have agreed to split any other child-related expenses, including medical and travel.

Britta gets physical custody, and will share legal custody with Track.


Guess Track would rather have his guns than his baby.  If he made $42,800 last year and $30,000 in the bank, why such a low amount for child support?  Is Kyla really the DWTS baby?  Maybe Britta just wanted rid of him.  Track got a good deal compared to Levi.  If Britta ever takes Track to court for skipping child support, you can be darn sure Sarah will get that squashed.  Britta don't hire Rex Butler for a lawyer!

 


Mitt Romney implicated in perjury and stock fraud, made millions in process



From the Examiner

Mitt Romney's involvement in a bitter divorce case between Staples' founder -- Tom Stemberg -- and his ex-wife -- Maureen Sullivan Stemberg -- is the October surprise that the Boston Globe and attorney Gloria Allred are playing a role in. According to an update by TMZ Wednesday, a judge in Boston deciding on whether to unseal records and lift a gag order from the 1991 case will not be made until Thursday.

When the Staples founder was divorcing his first wife, she allegedly got far less money than what the growing business was worth -- all on account of Romney's deposition. Allred is representing Maureen in the hopes that everything from the ugly court battle can be exposed.

A source told TMZ that at the time Romney testified that Staples was "overvalued" and "I didn't place a great deal of credibility in the forecast of the company's future." This was supposedly a lie to help out his friend in the divorce.

 Romney was the owner and CEO of Bain Capital at the time of the proceedings, Boston.com reports. It was a private equity firm that invested $650,000 into Staples as a way of pushing the office supply company to open its first store in Brighton back in 1986. In all, Bain Capital invested an estimated $2.5 million in the business and turned a $13 million profit when Staples went public in 1989.
T
MZ reports that just weeks after Stemberg divorced Maureen, he and Romney cashed in their stock at Goldman Sachs for a huge fortune. Maureen wound up with very little partly due to Romney's testimony.
Robert G. Jones -- an attorney representing Romney -- said the Republican presidential candidate "has no position on whether his testimony should be unsealed."

A rep for Tom Stemberg said this:
"Over the past several years, the judge in this case has made it very clear that the gag order imposed should not be violated. We have never violated this order and will continue to adhere to the court’s ruling on this case."

Edward Klein writes a book of lies about President Obama



From Inquisitor

The Obama divorce story currently circulating the web has caused some confusion and chatter about the state of the President and the First Lady’s marriage- but it appears to go back to a book called The Amateur: Barack Obama in the White House, which is, not surprisingly, an anti-Obama work.

The Obama divorce story is just one of a few questionable claims made in the book by former New York Times Magazine editor Edward Klein, who also alleged that Michelle Obama is cripplingly jealous of other women, that she feuds with media queen Oprah, and that President Obama and his entourage have “gone to elaborate lengths to hide his dark side.”

A few stories have popped up since the Obama divorce story went viral speculating on the current state of the First Relationship, but it all seems to go back to the original allegations made in the book- namely that the Obamas went through a rough patch twelve years ago and that Michelle considered leaving the man who would later become the most powerful man in the free world.

Even the Amazon description of The Amateur (if the title wasn’t telling enough) seems to indicate that the work alleging the Obama divorce story probably is not a reasoned work of political investigation and rather, a timed hit piece consisting of loosely strung suppositions about the President interspersed with shaky anecdotes. The description promises that the book will reveal:


  • Why the so-called “centrist” Obama is actually in revolt against the values of the society he was elected to lead
  • Why Bill Clinton loathes Barack Obama and tried to get Hillary to run against him in 2012
  • The spiteful rivalry between Michelle Obama and Oprah Winfrey
  • How Obama split the Kennedy family
  • How Obama has taken more of a personal role in making foreign policy than any president since Richard Nixon—with disastrous results
  • How Michelle Obama and Valerie Jarrett are the real powers behind the White House throne.
I don't believe this bullshit for a second.


The President and the First Lady probably have had their troubles.  What couple hasn't?  And if they didn't they won't be the first Presidential couple to do so.  Bill and Hillary Clinton's troubles are WELL documented, Laura threatened to leave Dumbya if he didn't quit drinking, St. Ronnie left Jane Wyman for Nancy,  LBJ had lots of women and fathered a son out of wedlock, JFK was a sex addict,  Eisenhower actually asked Harry Truman permission to leave Mamie for his secretary Kaye Summersby at the end of World War 2, Truman told him hell no.  Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt would have divorced if his mother had not intervened, and Harding fathered a daughter out of wedlock.


All the other stuff is bullshit too.  Clinton has praised President Obama on several occasions.


At least the First Couple don't act like this one:


This hit piece is just an act of desperation by the right wing.

Why would Sarah and Todd divorce while pregnant with Trig



One of the e-mails that came out on February 23

Why would a pregnant woman divorce her husband. Was Todd not the daddy? If so who was?
The more reasonable answer is Sarah was not pregnant.

Here is Sarah's tweet in response to this:


I don't think Sarah was joking.

Today is Sarah and Todd's anniversary





They were married on August 29, 1988.  Eight months later Track was born.  That means Sarah had a bun in the oven when they got married.



Who knows Sarah and Todd might be divorced and no one knows it.  Gryphen from Immoral Minority posted that they were Splitsville two years ago, Levi said all they did was fight, the Globe reported in June they worked out a secret divorce deal.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...